Kimmer Coppejans vs Kyle Edmund Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Wojtek Kolan
HEAD TO HEAD
K. Coppejans vs K. Edmund

Kimmer Coppejans
BEL
w
w
l
w
l
l
w
w
w
w
1
Win
1
Played
0
Win
31
Age
30
5'11" (180 cm)
Height
6'2" (188 cm)
183
C. Rank
542
97
Best Rank
14
0
Total Titles
2
0
YTD Titles
0
$337.8K
Career Money
$3.6M
Right-Handed
Plays
Right-Handed

Kyle Edmund
GBR
l
l
l
w
l
w
w
w
w
l
1
Win
1
Played
0
Win
31
Age
30
5'11" (180 cm)
Height
6'2" (188 cm)
183
C. Rank
542
97
Best Rank
14
0
Total Titles
2
0
YTD Titles
0
$337.8K
Career Money
$3.6M
Right-Handed
Plays
Right-Handed
Head-to-head: Coppejans 1 - 0 Edmund
They have played 3 sets in total, with Kimmer Coppejans winning 2 and Kyle Edmund winning 1. The last match between Kimmer Coppejans and Kyle Edmund was at the Turin Challenger, 01-05-2015, Round: QF, Surface: Clay, with Kimmer Coppejans getting the victory 6-7(5) 6-3 6-0.
Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
---|---|
Coppejans | 1 |
Edmund | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(QF) Turin Challenger(05-01-15)
Kimmer Coppejans
6
6
6
Kyle Edmund
7
3
0
K. Coppejans vs K. Edmund H2H Profile
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
$337,830 | Career Prize Money | $3,623,010 |
58.68% (490-345) | Career Total W/L | 60.60% (366-238) |
1 | Clay | 0 |
17 | Titles | 15 |
1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
K. Coppejans vs K. Edmund Match Preview:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Kimmer Coppejans has won 45.06% of points on their second serve, while Kyle Edmund has won 44.97%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Kimmer Coppejans, in recent form, has won 47.39% of their opponent's second serve points, while Kyle Edmund has won 44.16%. The same stats for first serve returns are 32.13% and 22.95% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Kimmer Coppejans has saved 54.90% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Kyle Edmund has saved 48.67% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Kimmer Coppejans has won 70.33% of matches played (W/L 64/27), with Kyle Edmund winning 58.62% (W/L 17/12) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Kimmer Coppejans has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 62% (W/L 146/89), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 25% (W/L 3/9). Kyle Edmund has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 62% (W/L 67/30), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 40% (W/L 20/30).
- Player level: In the last year, Kimmer Coppejans has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 60.71% of matches (W/L 34/22), where as Kyle Edmund has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 63.16% of matches (W/L 12/7). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Kimmer Coppejans winning 1 times and Kyle Edmund being victorious 0 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Kimmer Coppejans winning 2 and Kyle Edmund winning 1.
- The last match between Kimmer Coppejans and Kyle Edmund was at the Turin Challenger, 01-05-2015, Round: QF, Surface: Clay, with Kimmer Coppejans getting the victory 6-7(5) 6-3 6-0.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:18:7.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Kimmer Coppejans has played against opponents with an average rank of 307.02 while Kyle Edmund has played against players with an average rank of 470.34.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Kimmer Coppejans has won 60% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Kyle Edmund has won 60% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Kimmer Coppejans has converted 35.88% of breakpoint opportunities, and Kyle Edmund has converted 32.00% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Kimmer Coppejans vs Kyle Edmund Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
K. Coppejans vs K. Edmund H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
2 | Sets Won | 1 |
18 | Games Won | 10 |
5 | Aces (Total) | 1 |
8 | Total Double Faults | 0 |
2:18:7 | Average Match Time | 2:18:7 |
72% (82/114) | 1st Serve % | 64% (54/85) |
67% (55/82) | 1st Serve Win % | 54% (29/54) |
38% (12/32) | 2nd Serve Win % | 39% (12/31) |
88% (7/8) | Break Pts Won % | 20% (3/15) |
52% (44/85) | Return Points Win % | 41% (47/114) |
100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 100% (1/1) |
100% (1/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Recent Performance Stats
2nd Serve Win %: Coppejans 51%, Edmund 50%.
Opp 2nd Serve Pts Won: Coppejans 54%, Edmund 50%.
Break Points Saved %: Coppejans 60%, Edmund 48%.
K. Coppejans Recent Matches Played
K. Edmund Recent Matches Played

K. Coppejans vs K. Edmund Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
58.68% (490/345) | YTD Win/Loss | 60.60% (366/238) |
55.87% (1113/879) | Sets Win/Loss | 59.20% (862/594) |
52.60% (9825/8852) | Games Win/Loss | 53.20% (7449/6552) |
62.13% (146/89) | Hard Win/Loss | 56.79% (138/105) |
60.60% (323/210) | Clay Win/Loss | 65.89% (141/73) |
32.73% (18/37) | Indoor Hard W/L | 69.07% (67/30) |
25.00% (3/9) | Grass Win/Loss | 40.00% (20/30) |
0.25 | Aces Per Game | 0.38 |
2274 | Aces Total | 2576 |
0.21 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.18 |
1923 | Total Double Faults | 1266 |
1:30:2 | Average Match Time | 1:23:5 |
501.65 | Average Opponent Rank | 520.33 |
64% (32955/51320) | 1st Serve % | 59% (21718/36546) |
67% (22111/32955) | 1st Serve Win % | 72% (15735/21718) |
49% (8931/18365) | 2nd Serve Win % | 52% (7762/14820) |
43% (2486/5715) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 41% (1379/3358) |
42% (21994/52450) | Return Points Win % | 38% (13833/36405) |
52.86% (37/33) | Slam W/L | 55.17% (32/26) |
0.00% (0/1) | Masters W/L | 41.27% (26/37) |
33.33% (3/6) | Cups W/L | 58.33% (7/5) |
27.50% (11/29) | Main Tour W/L | 54.29% (76/64) |
56.80% (305/232) | Challenger W/L | 66.86% (117/58) |
75.28% (134/44) | Futures W/L | 69.48% (107/47) |
59% (482/820) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 62% (339/543) |
45% (5/11) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 47% (26/55) |
55% (125/226) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 51% (108/212) |
57% (178/312) | Deciding Set Win % | 47% (84/177) |
84% (455/381) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 84% (379/317) |
16% (455/73) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 16% (379/61) |
28% (380/108) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 22% (225/49) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
10:30 AM 12/10/25
PredictionW1
2.46
W2
1.5
11:00 AM 13/10/25
PredictionW1
1.57
W2
2.39
09:00 AM 13/10/25
PredictionW1
1.43
W2
2.81
08:00 AM 12/10/25
PredictionW1
1.87
W2
1.87
09:30 AM 12/10/25
PredictionW1
2.34
W2
1.55
09:00 AM 12/10/25
PredictionW1
1.61
W2
2.22
Tennis Previews & Betting Tips

Prediction Of Buyunchaokete Vs Zhizhen H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Lynk & Co Hangzhou Open 2025?

Prediction Of Basavareddy Vs Cilic H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Lynk & Co Hangzhou Open 2025?

Prediction Of Berrettini Vs Svrcina H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Lynk & Co Hangzhou Open 2025?

Prediction Of Dzumhur Vs Etcheverry H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Lynk & Co Hangzhou Open 2025?
Top Predictions Today
13:30
H2H 4-2
11:30
H2H 0-0
07:10
H2H 2-1
09:00
H2H 2-0
11:00
H2H 0-2
Tennis Events This Week
Shanghai Rolex Masters - Shanghai
China
Almaty Open - Almaty
Kazakhstan
BNP Paribas Nordic Open - Stockholm
Sweden
European Open - Brussels
Belgium
Cali Challenger
Colombia
Curitiba Challenger
Brazil
Hersonissos 5 Challenger
Greece
Hersonissos 6 Challenger
Greece
Jinan Challenger
China
Lincoln Challenger
United States
Olbia Challenger
Italy
Roanne Challenger
France
Shenzhen Challenger
China
Valencia Challenger
Spain
M15 Castellon
Spain
M15 Heraklion
Greece
M15 Lexington
United States
M15 Monastir
Tunisia
M15 Offenbach
Germany
M15 Pontevedra
Spain
M15 Rodez
France
M15 Sharm ElSheikh
Egypt
M15 Villers-les-Nancy
France
M25 Kigali
Rwanda
M25 Monastir
Tunisia
M25 Perth
Australia
M25 Santa Margherita di Pula
Italy